Why Multitasking is a Bad Thing

adult aged blur 834863 result

Content advisory 14+ We are all keen on . We it probably for the rush it gives as much as for what we imagine it accomplishes. A role model? We worship the manic magic of the multi-tasker. We pay a higher salary to acquire the gymnastic cerebral services of these mental contortionists and thumb our noses at the plodding, slo-mo guys who can't keep up. I mean. would YOU hire a worker who says that she (or he) cannot multitask? Who proclaimed himself to be a mere “one-at-a-time tasker” ??
Well, here is the bad news. The sad fact is that actually multitasking is ineffective (please do not mix with background tasks, shall explain later).

aerial business computer 1011329_result

Try this: write down a line of any text you like, even your name and last name. While writing, please put the number of each letter under it, just like this

So, if it would be multitasking, you should write like A 1 R 2, etc. Please note the time it took for you to do this.
Now, write your name and last name, after that write the number of each letter under it. It is task-by-task , and shall look for your like this: ARTEM 123456. Note the time it took.
Generally, the second option will give you 28% better timing, sometimes more.
Here comes the show.
If you try to force yourself or your employees to multitask, you are losing time and efficiency. The human brain cannot actually multitask. It switches from one task to another, and the lost time is the so-called “switching loss”, as we cannot do it immediately, we need to focus on the other task and only after that are able to work on it (computers do the same, they just switch faster - try closing other programs while doing something CPU-consuming).

beard chair computer 840996_result

However, multitasking should not be confused with background tasks, like walking and talking simultaneously, which is actually effective and possible, yet only if this comes in the form of an action which does not require the brain to focus on it.
Back to multitasking, the really bad thing is that constant multitasking is damaging to the neurons and can potentially lead to the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, which occurs when a eventually loses the capacity to work on a certain project for a proper period of time.
Basically, you are not effective at all if you switch more than once in 15 minutes; you are effective if you can focus on a task for at least 40 minutes, better an hour.
Wait, I should reply to my WhatsApp till I get back here…
Ok, keep reading, I'm with you, just a short reply…
Oh, yes, new e-mail, I should check, I think it is urgent, I'm really sorry, but keep reading, I'm still paying my attention…
Ok, last message in Telegram and I'm back on track of the article.
Here am I.

adult apple device business 340152_result

Where have we stopped?...
Annoying, isn't it? That's what we usually do to our colleagues and friends (and many of us - to our families), holding the phone in our hand, constantly distracting us from the conversation or the meeting, or even routine work, making it last much longer, taking much more effort and ending up with a headache, plus like a squeezed lemon at the end of the day.
Companies lose millions because of that. Their employees could have done much more if they were time-efficient, if they performed their tasks step-by-step, task-by-task, paying proper attention to each one.
Think of it. Add 20% revenue to your BS. Does it worth trying?

agenda analysis business 990818_result

I actually can multitask (if we are speaking about general perception). But should I? I'm actually still considering it and calculating. For now I see that it is better not to. But wait a minute, I've just got a phone call, and, damn, two new emails just jumped on the screen...and I am in a new restaurant checking out the menu, but my smart-watch that monitors my pulse-rate is signaling...and...my. wife just said something, what was that dear? -- hang on everybody, I have to check these new Telegram and WhatsUp messages, and what about that new Instagram…..and...just Wait a Second, OK???.... What did you say, dear? ….and...”

advice advise advisor 7097_result

===Artem Kovalev===

Voice by ReGerar


Last updated February 01, 2018


The information provided by ThinkMyTime ("we," "us," or "our") on https://thinkmytime.com/ (the "Site") is for general informational purposes only. All information on the Site is provided in good faith, however we make no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, reliability, availability, or completeness of any information on the Site. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE SHALL WE HAVE ANY LIABILITY TO YOU FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY KIND INCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE USE OF THE SITE OR RELIANCE ON ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THE SITE. YOUR USE OF THE SITE AND YOUR RELIANCE ON ANY INFORMATION ON THE SITE IS SOLELY AT YOUR OWN RISK. Please note that the opinions expressed by the authors on ThinkMyTime.com are their own and may differ from the opinions of the website's administrators or other authors. All posts are published "as is" and are intended to support free speech and open discussion. The website administrators do not endorse or take responsibility for any of the opinions or statements expressed by the authors on the website. ThinkMyTime.com is not responsible for any errors or omissions in the content provided by the authors. Readers should use their own judgment when reading the posts on this website and should not rely solely on the information provided herein.

This disclaimer was created using Termly's Disclaimer Generator.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Translate »
%d bloggers like this: